期刊
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 121, 期 1, 页码 205-212出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00040-5
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; multi criteria analysis; decision theory
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been criticized for allowing the introduction of new alternatives to cause rank reversals among existing alternatives. While in many cases this is a perfectly valid phenomenon there are also many cases where rank should be preserved. To address both contingencies the AHP now supports two types of synthesis procedures - one that preserves rank and one that does not. This paper proposes guidelines for the selection of one synthesis mode over the other. It also proposes several modifications to software implementations of the AHP to better support both synthesis modes and to reduce user stress over the choice. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据