4.6 Article

Rapid self-assembly of alkanethiol monolayers on sputter-grown Au(111)

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 1719-1728

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la990310z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomically flat, sputter-grown Au(111) films allowed well-ordered alkanethiol (exemplified by octanethiol) monolayers to be self-assembled from solution markedly faster and in larger domain sizes than previously reported. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis showed that complete monolayer coverage was reached by 0.2-60 min of incubation in 0.1-0.001 mM ethanolic solution at room temperature (similar to 17 degrees C), with single-step(0.1 and 0.01 mM) or two-step (0.001 mM) adsorption kinetics. Increasing the temperature to 35 degrees C was enough to cause a single-step, diffusion-controlled adsorption also from the 0.001 mM solution, yielding the full monolayer coverage in approximately 10 min. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) imaging proved that well-ordered islands, with the ( root 3 x root 3)R30 degrees structure more-or-less strongly modulated by the c(4 x 2) superlattice, begin to form at 0.6-0.7 monolayer coverage most likely by homogeneous nucleation and grow rapidly thereafter. This kinetics of ordering requiring the considerably high threshold coverage for the nucleation, but allowing the fast growth of the nuclei was independently confirmed by the infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy. A typical c(4 x 2) domain size at the saturation coverage was estimated to be no less than 10-15 nm, and the structural identity often seemed not to be disrupted even across the etch pits. This superior structural order is reflected on the highest level of molecular resolution achieved by the in-air STM imaging. The expected registry of the (root 3 x root 3)R30 degrees or c(4 x 2) lattice with that of Au(111) was also confirmed. On Au films that were also sputter-grown but no longer atomically flat, we observed at least by 1 order of magnitude slower self-assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据