4.7 Article

Complement-induced phospholipase A2 activation in experimental membranous nephropathy

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 1052-1062

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00932.x

关键词

arachidonic acid; eicosanoids; glomerulonephritis; passive Heyman nephritis; proteinuria; cell injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In the passive Heymann nephritis (PHN) model of membranous nephropathy. C5b-9 induces glomerular epithelial cell(GEC) injury and proteinuria. which is partially mediated by eicosanoids. By analogy, in cultured rat GEC, sublytic C5b-9 injures plasma membranes and releases arachidonic acid (AA) and eicosanoids. due to activation of phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)). This study addresses the mechanisms of PLA(2) activation. Methods. PLA(2) expression was assessed with the polymerase chain reaction or immunoblotting, and activity was determined using an in vitro assay or by measurement of free AA. Results. Under basal conditions. GEC in culture expressed a relatively low level of cytosolic PLA(2) (cPLA(2)) protein, while mRNAs of groups IB, IIA and V secretory PLA(2)s (sPLA(2)) were not detectable. Incubation of GEC with sublytic C5b-9 induced 1.5- to 2.0-fold increases in free [H-3]AA at 40 minutes, and three and 24 hours. C5b-9 did not increase cPLA(2) protein, and did not induce group IB, IIA or V sPLA(2), mRNAs. Stable overexpression of cPLA(2) in GEC amplified the C5b-9-induced increases in free [H-3]AA,while analogous overexpression of group IIA sPLA(2) had no effect. PLA(2) activity was increased in glomeruli of rats with PHN. and this enhanced activity was characterized as cPLA(2). There were no differences in cPLA(2) protein expression between PHN and control glomeruli. Conclusions. Release of AA by C5b-9 in GEC in culture and in vivo is mediated by cPLA(2) and the mechanism is consistent with post-translational regulation of cPLA(2) activity. C5b-9 does not induce expression or stimulate activity of sPLA(2) isoforms in GEC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据