4.7 Review

Architectures for molecular electronic computers: 1. Logic structures and an adder designed from molecular electronic diodes

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 386-426

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/5.838115

关键词

computer architecture; computer design; molecular circuit design; molecular diode-diode logic; molecular electronics; molecular logic circuits; nanoelectronics; quantum-effect circuits; quantum-effect devices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, there have been significant advances in the fabrication and demonstration of individual molecular electronic wires and diode switches. This paper reviews those developments and shows how demonstrated molecular devices might be combined to design molecular-scale electronic, digital computer logic. The design for the demonstrated rectifying molecular diode switches refined and made more compatible with the demonstrated wires through the introduction of intramolecular dopant groups chemically bonded to modified molecular wires. Quantum mechanical calculations are performed to characterize some of the electrical properties of the proposed molecular diode switches. Explicit structural designs are displayed for ND, OR, and XOR Rates that are built from molecular M ii-rs and molecular diode switches. The diode-based molecular electronic logic gates are combined to produce a design for a molecular scale electronic half adder and a molecular-scale electronic full adder. These designs correspond to conductive monomolecular circuit structures that would be one million times smaller in area than the corresponding micron-scale digital logic circuits fabric on conventional solid-state semiconductor computer chips. It appears likely that these nanometer-scale molecular electronic logic circuits could be fabricated and tested in the foreseeable future . At the very least. such molecular circuit designs constitute an exploration of the ultimate limits of electronic computer circuit mimiaturization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据