4.4 Article

Chemical fingerprint analysis and quantitative determination of steroidal compounds from Dioscorea villosa, Dioscorea species and dietary supplements using UHPLC-ELSD

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 281-294

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3019

关键词

Dioscorea villosa L; Dioscorea spp; UHPLC-ELSD; steroidal saponins; diosgenin

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (NCCAM) [P50AT006268]
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
  3. National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  4. United States Food and Drug Administration [5U01FD004246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with evaporative light scattering detection was used for the quantification of steroidal saponins and diosgenin from the rhizomes or tubers of various Dioscorea species and dietary supplements that were purported to contain Dioscorea. The analysis was performed on an Acquity UPLC system with an UPLC BEH Shield RP18 column using a gradient elution with water and acetonitrile. Owing to their low UV absorption, the steroidal saponins were observed by evaporative light scattering detection. The 12 compounds could be separated within 15min using the developed UHPLC method with detection limits of 5-12 mu g/mL with 2L injection volume. The analytical method was validated for linearity, repeatability, accuracy, limits of detection and limits of quantification. The relative standard deviations for intra- and inter-day experiments were <3.1%, and the recovery efficiency was 97-101%. The total content of standard compounds was found to be in the ranges 0.01-14.5% and 0.9-28.6mg daily intake for dry plant materials and solid commercial preparations, respectively. UHPLC-mass spectrometry with a quadrupole mass analyzer and ESI source was used only for confirmation of the identity of the various saponins. The developed method is simple, rapid and especially suitable for quality control analysis of commercial products. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据