4.5 Article

Oxidation of CO on a Pt-Fe alloy electrode studied by surface enhanced infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 104, 期 8, 页码 1762-1768

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp993001q

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To clarify the CO-tolerant mechanism at Pt-based alloy anode catalysts, surface-enhanced infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy with the attenuated total reflection technique(ATR-SEIRAS), coupled with CV measurement, was used to observe the oxidation process of adsorbed CO on a typical Pt-Fe (Pt-Fe = 0.27/0.73) alloy. The alloy electrode exhibits a lower saturated coverage of CO.(theta(CO) = 0.55) than that of pure Pt (theta(CO) = 1.0). The dominating linear CO is observed around 2000 cm(-1) when the equilibrium adlayer of CO covers the alloy electrode; however, linear and bridged CO and also GOON were found at the pure Pt electrode at the same CO coverage in the non-steady-state, On the basis of our previous results that a Pt skin is formed during the repetitive potential cycling due to the dissolution of Fe on the alloy surface and the skin exhibits less electronic density in the d band, it can be explained that the lowered linear CO coverage and almost no bridged CO are obtained as the result of the lowered back-donation of d electrons from the Pt skin to adsorbates on the alloy surface. The wavenumber shift of the linear CO stretching to a lower value at the alloy, which is not simply predicted by the lowering of the back-donation of the d electron, is ascribed to the weakening of the C-Pt bond. As a presumable effect of the electronic structure change at the Pt skin, the dissociation-oxidation of adsorbed water as well as a formation of adsorbed HOOH species are clearly observed beyond 0.6 V in the electrolyte solution without CO, which is different from that at the pure Pt electrode. Carbonate species can also be detected around 1300-1450cm(-1), which are possibly produced by the surface-reaction of CO2 with water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据