4.4 Article

Histidine affinity chromatography of homo-oligonucleotides. Role of multiple interactions on retention

期刊

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 745-753

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.1179

关键词

affinity chromatography; histidine-agarose support; multiple interactions; oligonucleotides; secondary structure

资金

  1. FCT
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PTDC/EQU-EQU/65492/2006]
  3. [SFRH/BD/41390/2007]
  4. [SFRH/BD/24184/2005]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24184/2005] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent application of histidine-agarose affinity supports in plasmid purification takes advantage of the biorecognition of nucleic acid bases by the histidine ligand. This consideration prompted the need for better understanding the interactions involved in affinity chromatography of plasmid DNA with the histidine-agarose support. In this work, we used synthetic homo-deoxyoligonucleotides with different sizes (1-30 nucleotides long), to explore the effect of several conditions like hydrophobic character of the individual bases, presence of secondary structures, temperature, pH and salt concentration on the mechanism of retention of nucleic acids to histidine-agarose support. One of the most striking results shows that histidine interacts preferentially with guanine, and the presence of secondary structures on polyA and polyG oligonucleotides has a significant influence on retention. Otherwise, the temperature manipulation has not shown a direct influence on oligonucleotide retention, only inducing conformational changes on secondary structures. Overall, the results obtained provide valuable information for the future development and implementation of histidine and other amino acids as ligands in chromatography for the purification of plasmid DNA and other nucleic acids, by improving the knowledge of the interactions involved as well as of the parameters influencing the retention. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据