4.8 Article

Platelet GP IIIa PlA polymorphisms display different sensitivities to agonists

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 1013-1018

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.9.1013

关键词

platelets; coronary disease; polymorphisms; inhibitors

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-57488] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Both inherited predisposition and platelet hyperreactivity have been associated with ischemic coronary events, but mechanisms that support genetic differences among platelets from different subjects are generally lacking. Associations between the platelet PIA2 polymorphism of GP IIIa and coronary syndromes raise the question as to whether this inherited variation may contribute to platelet hyperreactivity. Methods and Results-In this study, we characterized functional parameters in platelets from healthy donors with the Pl(A) (HPA-1) polymorphism, a Leu (Pl(A1)) to Pro (pl(A2)) substitution at position 33 of the GP IIIa subunit of the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor (integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3)). We studied 56 normal donors (20 PIA1,A1, 20 Pl(A1,A2), and 16 Pl(A2A2)). Compared with pl(A1,A1) platelets, Pl(A2)-positive platelets showed a gene dosage effect for significantly,greater surface-expressed P-selectin, GP IIb/IIIa-bound fibrinogen, and activated GP IIb/IIIa in response to low-dose ADP. Surface expression of GP IIb/IIIa was similar in resting platelets of all 3 genotypes but was significantly greater on Pl(A2,A2) platelets after ADP stimulation (P=0.003 versus Pl(A1,A1); P=0.03 versus pl(A1,A2)). Pl(A1,A2) platelets were more sensitive to inhibition of aggregation by pharmacologically relevant concentrations of aspirin and abciximab. Conclusions-Pl(A2)-positive platelets displayed a lower threshold for activation, and platelets heterozygous for Pl(A) alleles showed increased sensitivity to 2 antiplatelet drugs, These in vitro platelet studies may have relevance for in vivo thrombotic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据