4.1 Article

Block of voltage-dependent calcium channel by the green mamba toxin calcicludine

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 174, 期 2, 页码 157-165

出版社

SPRINGER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002320001040

关键词

calcium channel blockers; peptide toxins; pharmacology; partial pore block; calcium channel chimeras; channel gating

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of peptide toxins derived from marine snails and various spiders have been shown to potently inhibit voltage-dependent calcium channels. Here, we describe the effect of calcicludine, a 60 amino-acid peptide isolated from the venom of the green mamba (Dendroaspis angusticeps), on transiently expressed high voltage-activated calcium channels. Upon application of calcicludine, L-type (alpha(1C)) calcium channels underwent a rapid, irreversible decrease in peak current amplitude with no change in current kinetics, or any apparent voltage-dependence. However, even at saturating toxin concentrations, block was always incomplete with a maximum inhibition of 58%, indicating either partial pore block, or an effect on channel gating. Block nonetheless was of high affinity with an IC50 value of 88 nM. Three other types of high voltage activated channels tested (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1E)) exhibited a diametrically different response to calcicludine. First, the maximal inhibition observed was around 10%, furthermore, the voltage-dependence of channel activation was shifted slightly towards more negative potentials. Thus, at relatively hyperpolarized test potentials, calcicludine actually upregulated current activity of (N-type) alpha(1B) channels by as much as 50%. Finally, the use of several chimeric channels combining the major transmembrane domains of alpha(1C) and alpha(1E) revealed that calcicludine block of L-type calcium channels involves interactions with multiple structural domains. Overall, calcicludine is a potent and selective inhibitor of neuronal L-type channels with a unique mode of action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据