4.6 Article

TNF-α, IL-4, and IFN-γ regulate differential expression of P and E-selectin expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 164, 期 6, 页码 3309-3315

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.3309

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P- and E-selectin are surface glycoproteins that mediate leukocyte rolling on the surface of endothelium in inflammation. We have cloned porcine P-selectin cDNA and generated a mAb, 12C5, with which to examine P-selectin expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) in comparison with that of E selectin. Basal expression by PAEC of P-selectin was greater than that of E-selectin, whereas E-selectin expression was more prominently enhanced than that of P-selectin by stimulation with TNF-alpha or IL-1 alpha, Both human or porcine IL-4 led to an increase in P-selectin expression, with kinetics that were delayed compared with those seen following stimulation with TNF-alpha or IL-1 alpha, but IL-4 did not stimulate expression of E-selectin, When cells were stimulated with TNF-alpha in the presence of IL-4, we observed enhanced P-selectin expression with a parallel reduction in E-selectin expression. Finally, the increase in P-selectin expression due to human IL-4 was reduced in the presence of porcine but not human IFN-gamma, These observations show that E-selectin and P-selectin expression are differentially regulated in PAEC, and that IL-4 leads to a shift in the relative surface density of the two molecules toward P-selectin. The ability of porcine IFN-gamma to inhibit IL-il-induced P-selectin expression suggests that the balance between Th1 and Th2 cytokine production may determine the relative densities of the two selectins in chronic immune-mediated inflammation. Because the increased expression of F-selectin induced by human IL-4 was not inhibited by human IFN-gamma, this balance may he shifted toward P-selectin expression in porcine xenografts infiltrated by human lymphocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据