4.7 Review

19F-MRS studies of fluorinated drugs in humans

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 55-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-409X(99)00056-3

关键词

drug targeting; pharmacokinetic imaging; tumor response; 5-fluorouracil; compartmental modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of F-19-NMR as a noninvasive probe to measure directly the pharmacokinetics of drugs at their target (effector) site(s) is illustrated in this article by human studies with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This drug, and several of its metabolites, have been measured in vivo in animals and in patients using standard clinical MRI systems. Using a pharmacokinetic imaging approach the parameter that can be measured most readily is the tumoral t(1/2) of 5-FU. Patients whose tumoral t(1/2) of 5-FU is equal to/greater than 20 min are designated as trappers, and those whose tumoral t(1/2) of 5-FU is less are nontrappers. Trapping of 5-FU in tumors is a necessary, albeit not a sufficient condition, for response. Problems associated with the technical aspects of these measurements have been discussed, as well as how modulators and other agents will affect the tumoral t(1/2) of 5-FU. The rationale for the biological processes underlying the fate of 5-FU in humans has been illustrated with the use of a 12 compartment model, where several of the steps have been discussed and the consequences of their inhibition/stimulation related to the noninvasive studies that can be performed with modulators of the action of 5-FU. These F-19-NMR studies have now been extended to other fluoropyrimidines, some of which are prodrugs of 5-Fu, and others where the fluorine atoms are on the ribose ring. These studies also reveal information that has both scientific and clinical significance. The studies presented here illustrate some of the potential and some of the usefulness of F-19-MRS in patient management and in drug development. It is a technique that has proven itself. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据