4.6 Article

Fractalkine is an epithelial and endothelial cell-derived chemoattractant for intraepithelial lymphocytes in the small intestinal mucosa

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 164, 期 6, 页码 3368-3376

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.3368

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 21474, DK 51003, DK 54427] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fractalkine is a unique chemokine that combines properties of both chemoattractants and adhesion molecules, Fractalkine mRNA expression has been observed in the intestine. However, the role of fractalkine in the healthy intestine and during inflammatory mucosal responses is not known, Studies were undertaken to determine the expression and function of fractalkine and the fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 in the human small intestinal mucosa, Wt? identified intestinal epithelial cells as a novel source of fractalkine. The basal expression of fractalkine mRNA and protein in the intestinal epithelial cell line T-84 was under the control of the inflammatory mediator a-lp. Fractalkine was shed from intestinal epithelial cell surface upon stimulation with IL-IP. Fractalkine localized with caveolin-1 in detergent-insoluble glycolipid-enriched membrane microdomains in T-84 cells. Cellular distribution of fractalkine was regulated during polarization of T-84 cells. A subpopulation of isolated human intestinal intra-epithelial lymphocytes expressed the fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 and migrated specifically along fractalkine gradients after activation with IL-2, Immunohistochemistry demonstrated fractalkine expression in intestinal epithelial cells and endothelial cells in normal small intestine and in active Crohn's disease mucosa, Furthermore, fractalkine mRNA expression was significantly up-regulated in the intestine during active Crohn's disease, This study demonstrates that fractalkine-CX(3)CR1-mediated mechanism may direct lymphocyte chemoattraction and adhesion within the healthy and diseased human small intestinal mucosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据