4.8 Article

Photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolaevulinic acid or placebo for recalcitrant foot and hand warts: randomised double-blind trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 355, 期 9208, 页码 963-966

出版社

LANCET LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90013-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) followed by irradiation with incoherent light (ALA-PDT) for recalcitrant warts have had beneficial results, Therefore, we undertook a randomised, parallel, double-blind clinical trial of ALA-PDT versus placebo-PDT for recalcitrant foot and hand warts. Methods Recalcitrant foot and hand warts were randomly assigned to six repetitive ALA-PDT or placebo-PDT interventions combined with standard treatment encompassing paring followed by a keratolytic (Verucid), Standardised photographs of each wart were taken before, during (week 7) and after treatment (weeks 14 and 18). The area of each wart compared with entry area was the primary outcome variable, measured from photographs by arl evaluator unaware of treatment allocation for intervention. Pain intensity immediately and 24 h after each intervention was assessed by a five-point scale. Findings A total of 232 foot and hand warts in 45 patients were entered into the trial: 117 warts were allocated to ALA-PDT and 115 warts to placebo-PDT. In week 14, the median relative reduction in wart area was 98% in the ALA-PDT group (interquartile range 100%, 55%) versus 52% (100%, 0) in the placebo group (p = 0.0006,), In week 18, the median relative reduction in wart area wa!; 100% in the ALA-PDT group (100%, 57%) versus 71% (100%, 0) in the placebo-PDT arm (p = 0.008). Both the number of vanishing warts and the difference in relative wart area of persisting warts at week 14 and 18 were significant (p < 0.05) in favour of ALA-PDT, Significantly more ALA-PDT warts were graded at a higher pain intensity after treatment than placebo-PDT warts. Interpretation ALA-PDT is superior to placebo-PDT when both wart area and number of vanishing warts are considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据