4.7 Article

Role of lipooligosaccharide in Opa-independent invasion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae into human epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 191, 期 6, 页码 949-959

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.191.6.949

关键词

pathogenesis; cell biology; immunofluorescence outer membrane proteins; virulence factors

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI024452, R56 AI024452, AI01470, AI24452] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipooligosaccharide (LOS) has been implicated in the adhesion and invasion of host epithelial cells. We examined the adhesive and invasive abilities of isogenic gonococcal opacity-associated outer membrane protein-negative, pilus-positive (Opa(-)Pil(+)) Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains expressing genetically defined LOS. Strain F62 (Opa(-)Pil(+)), expressing the lacto-N-neotetraos and the galNac-lacto-N-neotetraose LOS, and its isogenic derivative that expressed only the lacto-N-neotetraose LOS (F62 Delta lgtD), adhered to, and invaded, to the same extent the human cervical epidermoid carcinoma cell line, ME180. While the adhesive abilities of Opa(-)Pil(+) isogenic strains that express LOS molecules lacking the lacto-N-neotelraose structure were similar to that seen for F62, their invasive abilities were much lower than the strains expressing lacto-N-neotetraose. Fluorescence microscopy studies showed that the adherence of F62, but not the: strains lacking lacto-N-neotetraose, induced the rearrangement of actin filaments under the adherent sites. Electron microscopy studies demonstrated that F62, but not the strains lacking lacto-N-neotetraose, formed extensive and intimate associations with epithelial cell membranes. Thus, in the absence of detectable Opa protein, the lacto-N-neotetraose LOS promotes gonococcal invasion into ME180 cells. The data also suggest that LOS is involved in the mobilization of actin filaments in host cells, and in the formation of a direct interaction between the bacterial outer membrane and the plasma membrane of ME180 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据