4.8 Article

Cryo-chemical decellularization of the whole liver for mesenchymal stem cells-based functional hepatic tissue engineering

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 3607-3617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.024

关键词

Acellular liver scaffolds; Mesenchymal stem cells; Hepatic-like tissues; Transplantation

资金

  1. Taiwan National Science Council I-RiCE Program [NSC101-29114-009-101]
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [VGH102E1-007, VGH102C-001]
  3. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC102-2120-M-010-002, NSC100-2314-B-010-030-MY3, and NSC102-2321-B-010-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver transplantation is the ultimate treatment for severe hepatic failure to date. However, the limited supply of donor organs has severely hampered this treatment. So far, great potentials of using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to replenish the hepatic cell population have been shown; nevertheless, there still is a lack of an optimal three-dimensional scaffold for generation of well-transplantable hepatic tissues. In this study, we utilized a cryo-chemical decellularization method which combines physical and chemical approach to generate acellular liver scaffolds (ALS) from the whole liver. The produced ALS provides a biomimetic three-dimensional environment to support hepatic differentiation of MSCs, evidenced by expression of hepatic-associated genes and marker protein, glycogen storage, albumin secretion, and urea production. It is also found that hepatic differentiation of MSCs within the ALS is much more efficient than two-dimensional culture in vitro. Importantly, the hepatic-like tissues (HLT) generated by repopulating ALS with MSCs are able to act as functional grafts and rescue lethal hepatic failure after transplantation in vivo. In summary, the cryo-chemical method used in this study is suitable for decellularization of liver and create acellular scaffolds that can support hepatic differentiation of MSCs and be used to fabricate functional tissue-engineered liver constructs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据