4.5 Article

Effect of the alkyl-lysophospholipids on the proliferation and differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 75, 期 2, 页码 219-228

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00052-8

关键词

Trypanosoma cruzi; chemotherapy; alkyl-lysophospholipids; edelfosine; ET-18-OCH3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkyl-lysophospholipids (ALPs), designed as potential immunomodulators, have been shown to be cytotoxic for a variety of tumour cells and are under clinical studies for cancer chemotherapy. ET-18-OCH3, hexadecylphosphocholine and ilmofosine were assayed against the three forms of Trypanosoma cruzi. Incubation with bloodstream trypomastigotes resulted, under different experimental conditions, in higher activity of the compounds in comparison with crystal violet. The ED50/24 h values were 13.4 +/- 2.8 mu M and 11.7 +/- 0.6 mu M for amastigotes and epimastigotes, respectively. ET-18-OCH3 (0.3 and 0.6 mu M) inhibited the differentiation of epimastigotes to trypomastigotes (Dm28C clone) in the range 40-57%. This drug (3.75-15 mu M) also caused a time- and dose-dependent inhibition of the intracellular proliferation of amastigotes in heart muscle cells with ED50 values of 14.3 +/- 4.2, 8.9 +/- 1.9 and 6.8 +/- 0.4 mu M, after 1, 2 and 3 days of treatment. Pre-treatment of the parasite with this drug inhibited its interiorization into the host cell. Interestingly, the intracellular differentiation of amastigotes to trypomastigotes was not hampered by the drug. The present results demonstrate the lytic effect of ALPs on the three forms of T. cruzi, as well as the inhibition of both the differentiation to the infective form and the proliferation of parasites interiorized in heart cells. Ultrastructural analysis of epimastigotes treated with the three ALPs showed extensive blebing of the flagellar membrane. As described in tumour cells, the membrane seems to be a primary target of the drugs. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据