4.8 Article

Iron/iron oxide core/shell nanoparticles for magnetic targeting MRI and near-infrared photothermal therapy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 26, 页码 7470-7478

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.063

关键词

Iron/iron oxide nanoparticles; Magnetic targeting; Theranostics; Photothermal therapy; In vivo

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21271130, 21371122]
  2. program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1269]
  3. Shanghai Natural Science Fund Project [12ZR1421800, 13520502800]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [13PJ1406600]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13ZZ110]
  6. Shanghai Normal University [DXL122, SK201339]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of photothermal agents (PTAs) with good stability, low toxicity, highly targeting ability and photothermal conversion efficiency is an essential pre-requisite to near-infrared photothermal therapy (PTT) in vivo. Herein, we report the readily available PEGylated Fe@Fe3O4 NPs, which possess triple functional properties in one entity - targeting, PTT, and imaging. Compared to Au nanorods, they exhibit comparable photothermal conversion efficiency (similar to 20%), and much higher photothermal stability. They also show a high magnetization value and transverse relaxivity (similar to 156 mM(-1) s(-1)), which should be applied for magnetic targeting MRI With the Nd-Fe-B magnet (0.5 T) beside the tumour for 12 h on the xenograft HeLa tumour model, PEGylated Fe@Fe3O4 NPs exhibit an obvious accumulation. In tumour, the intensity of MRI signal is similar to three folds and the increased temperature is similar to two times than those without magnetic targeting, indicating the good magnetic targeting ability. Notably, the intrinsic high photothermal conversion efficiency and selective magnetic targeting effect of the NPs in tumour play synergistically in highly efficient ablation of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据