4.8 Article

Maximizing cartilage formation and integration via a trajectory-based tissue engineering approach

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 2140-2148

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.031

关键词

Tissue engineering; Hyaluronic acid; Hydrogels; Cartilage; Integration; Maturation

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01 EB008722, F32 AR062971]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs [101 RX000700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the limitations of current surgical approaches to treat articular cartilage injuries, tissue engineering (TE) approaches have been aggressively pursued. Despite reproduction of key mechanical attributes of native tissue, the ability of TE cartilage constructs to integrate with native tissue must also be optimized for clinical success. In this paper, we propose a trajectory-based tissue engineering (TB-TE) approach, based on the hypothesis that time-dependent increases in construct maturation in-vitro prior to implantation (i.e. positive rates) may provide a reliable predictor of in-vivo success. As an example TE system, we utilized hyaluronic acid hydrogels laden with mesenchymal stem cells. We first modeled the maturation of these constructs in-vitro to capture time-dependent changes. We then performed a sensitivity analysis of the model to optimize the timing and amount of data collection. Finally, we showed that integration to cartilage in-vitro is not correlated to the maturation state of TE constructs, but rather their maturation rate, providing a proof-of-concept for the use of TB-TE to enhance treatment outcomes following cartilage injury. This new approach challenges the traditional TE paradigm of matching only native state parameters of maturity and emphasizes the importance of also establishing an in-vitro trajectory in constructs in order to improve the chance of in-vivo success. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据