4.8 Article

Pluronic-encapsulated natural chlorophyll nanocomposites for in vivo cancer imaging and photothermal/photodynamic therapies

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 29, 页码 8357-8373

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.049

关键词

Dietary chlorophyll; Organic nanocomposites; In vivo cancer imaging; Photothermal therapy; Photodynamic therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071833, 31370961]
  2. Nanoscience Foundation of Shanghai [13NM1402000]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0618]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A great challenge in developing nanotechnologies for cancer diagnosis and therapy has been the combined functionalities required for complicated clinical procedures. Among all requirements, toxicity has been the major hurdle that has prevented most of the nano-carriers from clinical use. Here, we extracted chlorophyll (Chl) from vegetable and encapsulated it into polymer (pluronic F68, Plu) micelles for cancer imaging and therapy. The results showed that the Chl-containing nanocomposites were capable of mouse tumor targeting, and the nanocomposite fluorescence within the tumor sites remained at high intensity more than two days after tail-vein injection. It is interesting that oral administration with the nanocomposites was also successful for tumor target imaging. Furthermore, the dietary Chl was found to be able to efficiently convert near-infrared laser irradiation to heat. The growths of melanoma cells and mouse tumors were effectively inhibited after being treated with the nanocomposites and irradiation. The suppression of the tumors was achieved by laser-triggered photothermal and photodynamic synergistic effects of Chl. As a natural substance from vegetable, Chl is non-toxic, making it an ideal nano-carrier for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Based on the results of this research, the Plu-Chl nanocomposites have shown promise for future clinical applications. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据