4.8 Article

The effect of serum in culture on RNAi efficacy through modulation of polyplexes size

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 567-577

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.102

关键词

RNA interference; Non-viral vectors; Pullulan-spermine; Serum tolerance; Endo-lysosomal escape

资金

  1. National Key Program of China (973 program) [2011CB933504, 2010CB934002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271926]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serum in the culture medium is one crucial factor that compromises RNAi efficiency of non-viral vectors. However, mechanistic roles of serum in siRNA delivery remain unknown. In this work, we took one cationic polymer, pullulan chemically modified by spermine (termed as pullulan-spermine, Ps), as a siRNA carrier model to investigate the effects of serum on key steps in siRNA delivery including formation of Ps and siRNA polyplexes (Ps-siRNA), cellular uptake, lysosomal escape, and cytotoxicity. We demonstrate that low serum concentration (1.25% and 2.5%) in culture medium results in large particles of Ps-siRNA, while high serum concentration (10%-40%) leads to small particles of Ps-siRNA. The larger particles initiated the internalization of siRNA more effectively in comparison to the smaller ones. The engulfed Ps-siRNA particles mainly locate in lysosomes. The large particles exhibited stronger abilities of destabilizing lysosomes than that of the small particles as large Ps-siRNA particles contain more amines and subsequently elicit a stronger proton sponge effect which results in more effective lysosomal escape of siRNA. Despite the lower RNAi efficiency, the small particle of Ps-siRNA in the high serum medium generates much lower cytotoxicity. These findings explain why serum significantly affects RNAi and also propose a strategy for improving RNAi efficiency and safety by modulating serum concentration and enhancing lysosomal destabilization. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据