4.8 Article

PEGylated NaLuF4: Yb/Er upconversion nanophosphors for in vivo synergistic fluorescence/X-ray bioimaging and long-lasting, real-time tracking

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 35, 期 36, 页码 9689-9697

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.021

关键词

Upconversion nanophosphors; Long-lasting real-time tracking; Synergistic in vivo fluorescence and X-ray bioimaging; Biodistribution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51102202, 31370736]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20114301120006]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [12JJ4056]
  4. Hunan Provincial Education Department [13B062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous in vivo luminescence and X-ray bioimaging in a tissue or animal integrates the advantages of each single-modal imaging technology, and will find widespread application in biological and clinical fields. However, synergistic dual-modal bioimaging that utilizes a new generation of upconversion nanoprobes is still limited. In addition, investigations concentrated on in vivo biodistribution of these nanoprobes may contribute to diagnosis and treatment, but long-term in vivo tracking based on these nanoprobes is rarely reported. In this work, water-soluble NaLuF4: Yb/Er nanophosphors were prepared through modified one-pot simultaneous synthesis and surface modification method. Owing to the outstanding upconverting emissions and large X-ray absorption coefficient/K-edge value of Lu and doped Yb ions, the obtained nanoprobes were successfully used as luminescent nanoprobes and X-ray contrast agents for in vivo synergistic upconversion luminescence and X-ray bioimaging. The in vivo biodistribution of these nanoprobes were observed, and the results based on long-term tracking reveal that the as-prepared nanoprobes first aggregated in the lung of the mouse, transferred to the liver, and finally moved to the spleen. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据