4.8 Article

Designer D-form self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for 3-dimensional cell cultures

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 34, 期 21, 页码 4902-4913

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.081

关键词

Chiral self-assembly peptide; 3D cell culture; Apoptosis; Nanofibers; D-form peptide 3D cell culture protocols; Proposal model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81101417]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of CQCSTC [2011BB5134]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20115503120010]
  4. China National 985 Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional 2-D cell cultures have many limitations because they do not truly mimic the natural environment. In order to fully understand the in vivo 3-D environment, it is crucial to develop a biomimetic 3-D culture system. Recently progress toward 3-D tissue cell cultures has been gradually made by addressing many critical issues including the microenvironment, gradient diffusion and apoptosis. Here we report a D-form self-assembly peptide system that provides insight into the relationships between nanofiber scaffolds and cell behaviors in 3-D cell cultures. We observed the peptide secondary structures response to ions and confirmed that their participation increases mechanical force rapidly. We also showed the enzymes attachment to nanofibers, investigated scaffolds to form 3-D microenvironment and described a modified protocol for 3-D cell culture D-form self-assembly peptide. Using this protocol, we showed cell behavior in the D-form peptide with high cell viability and low-level cell apoptosis for weeks. Furthermore, we proposed a plausible model for chiral self-assembly peptides in 3-D culture. Our research may further stimulate others to design novel biological materials at single chiral amino acid level, and may broaden the applications of designer D-form self-assembling peptides in clinical and medical nanobiotechnology. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All tights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据