4.8 Article

Surface engineering of cardiovascular stent with endothelial cell selectivity for in vivo re-endothelialisation

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2588-2599

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.036

关键词

Stent; Endothelialisation; Endothelial cell selectivity; Competitive adhesion

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50830106, 21174126]
  2. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51025312]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB606203]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [SKLSSM201204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in vivo endothelialisation of materials provides a promising strategy for the rapid re-endothelialisation of a cardiovascular implantation. Although many studies have focused on improving the rapid endothelialisation through the immobilisation of bioactive molecules, it should be noted that the endothelial cells (ECs) will compete with other cell types in vivo. Thus, the efforts to partially enhance the EC growth without considering the cell competition might be misleading and meaningless in vivo. In this study, we demonstrated that the competitive growth of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) over human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) could be increased through the synergic action of the nonspecific resistance to phosphorylcholine and the specific recognition of the REDV peptide. Further in vivo data indicate that the competitive ability of ECs over SMCs, instead of the number of ECs, is a significantly more important criterion for the development of a pure endothelial layer in vivo and thus the attainment of a better anti-restenosis effect. Consequently, the surface tailoring of a stent to obtain high endothelial cell selectivity is likely an effective design criterion for in situ endothelialisation and a possible future solution for the problem of in-stent restenosis. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据