4.7 Article

Neural and endothelial control of the microcirculation in diabetic peripheral neuropathy

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 1246-1252

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.54.6.1246

关键词

diabetic neuropathy; nitric oxide; endothelium; axon reflex

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG08812] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine the role played by endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation of the cutaneous microcirculation and their relationship to neural microcirculatory control in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: Acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were iontophoresed using a dose-response technique. Endothelium-dependent, endothelium-independent, and C-fiber-mediated vasodilation were measured with a laser Doppler device. Results: Endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the forearm cutaneous microcirculation was attenuated in diabetic subjects. The response was less in type 2 diabetic subjects than in controls (p < 0.005). In contrast, there was no significant difference between type 1 diabetic subjects and controls. There was no significant abnormality in endothelium-independent vasodilation in either diabetic group. The C-fiber-mediated axon reflex in the forearm was impaired in both type 1 and type 2 diabetics, which is consistent with a small-fiber neuropathy (p < 0.005). The duration of diabetes in type 2 diabetics was a significant predictor of the maximum endothelium-mediated vasodilation. Conclusion: Changes in cutaneous blood flow are seen relatively early in the course of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and are characterized by endothelial and neural but not smooth muscle dysfunction. The presence of significant C-fiber impairment in both diabetic groups, together with significantly greater dysfunction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in type 2 diabetics, suggests that the endothelial function and nitric oxide may play a greater role in the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据