4.8 Article

Elastic modulus and viscoelastic properties of full thickness skin characterised at micro scales

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 2087-2097

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.035

关键词

Skin; Elastic modulus; Viscoelastic; Micro-probe; Indentation

资金

  1. University of Queensland Endeavour International Post-graduate Research Scholarship
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [569726, 631720]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP1093281]
  4. Queensland Smart State Scheme
  5. Australian Research Council [DP1093281] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent emergence of micro-devices for vaccine delivery into upper layers of the skin holds potential for increased immune responses using physical means to target abundant immune cell populations. A challenge in doing this has been a limited understanding of the skin elastic properties at the micro scale (i.e. on the order of a cell diameter; similar to 10 mu m). Here, we quantify skin's elastic properties at a micro-scale by fabricating customised probes of scales from sub- to super-cellular (0.5 mu m-20 mu m radius). We then probe full thickness skin; first with force-relaxation experiments and subsequently by elastic indentations. We find that skin's viscoelastic response is scale-independent: consistently a similar to 40% decrease in normalised force over the first second, followed by further 10% reduction over 10 s. Using Prony series and Hertzian contact analyses, we determined the strain-rate independent elastic moduli of the skin. A high scale dependency was found: the smallest probe encountered the highest elastic modulus (similar to 30 MPa), whereas the 20 mu m radius probe was lowest (below 1 MPa). We propose that this may be a result of the load distribution in skin facilitated by the hard corneocytes in the outermost skin layers, and softer living cell layers below. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据