4.4 Article

Temporal and spatial use of stranded wrack by the macrofauna of a tropical sandy beach

期刊

MARINE BIOLOGY
卷 136, 期 3, 页码 531-541

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s002270050713

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During two field studies the macrofauna associated with wrack stranded on a tropical sandy shore was analysed, During the first period all animals present in small wrack deposits were randomly collected with cores. During the second field study active animals were sampled in larger wrack deposits for an entire lunar period, and tube traps were used. After a comparison between the two studies, only the data from the tube traps were examined from a temporal and spatial point of view. The aim of the present work was to gain information on how, when and where wrack was colonised by invertebrates, keeping in mind cyclical aspects such as lunar, diel and tidal phases. Predatory taxa, such as Staphylinoidea and the amphipods Talorchestia martensii. were most abundant, whereas Diptera larvae and Tenebrionidae were scarce. Successional changes of beach wrack colonisation were evident throughout a semi-lunar period, with molluscs invading wrack during the first days of deposition and histerids during the last ones. Strictly nocturnal or diurnal surface-active species were found to be active in the wrack during both the day and the night. The analysis of the tidal component of species activity in the wrack showed that some species moved at ebbing tide, and others moved at rising tide. Differences were found also in the mean hours of tidal activity, calculated separately during day and night periods. The study of the zonation of each species showed that in some cases wrack deposits were closely followed by the fauna as their position changed during the semilunar phase. In other cases differences occurred between species zonation during day and night periods and tidal phases. Cluster analysis indicates that most species exploit the wrack in different ways (as refuges and/or feeding site), both in space and in time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据