4.8 Article

The relationship between brain tumor cell invasion of engineered neural tissues and in vivo features of glioblastoma

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 34, 期 33, 页码 8279-8290

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.006

关键词

In vitro test; Nerve tissue engineering; Neural cell; Stem cell

资金

  1. 3R Research Foundation
  2. ARTERES Foundation
  3. ISREC Foundation
  4. Egon Naef Foundation
  5. association pour la recherche sur le cancer [3161]
  6. association Sauvons Laura
  7. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche ANR (GLIOMIRSTEM project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor characterized by its high propensity for local invasion, formation of secondary foci within the brain, as well as areas of necrosis. This study aims to (i) provide a technical approach to reproduce features of the disease in vitro and (ii) characterize the tumor/host brain tissue interaction at the molecular level. Human engineered neural tissue (ENT) obtained from pluripotent stem cells was generated and co-cultured with human glioblastoma-initiating cells. Within two weeks, glioblastoma cells invaded the nervous tissue. This invasion displayed features of the disease in vivo: a primary tumor mass, diffuse migration of invading single cells into the nervous tissue, secondary foci, as well as peritumoral cell death. Through comparative molecular analyses, this model allowed the identification of more than 100 genes that are specifically induced and up-regulated by the nervous tissue/tumor interaction. Notably the type I interferon response, extracellular matrix-related genes were most highly represented and showed a significant correlation with patient survival. In conclusion, glioblastoma development within a nervous tissue can be engineered in vitro, providing a relevant model to study the disease and allows the identification of clinically-relevant genes induced by the tumor/host tissue interaction. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据