4.8 Article

A hybrid nanofiber matrix to control the survival and maturation of brain neurons

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 545-555

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.093

关键词

Self assembly; Laminin; Collagen; Peptide amphiphile; Nerve tissue engineering; Brain

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIBIB [5R01EB003806-04]
  2. RIKEN BSI
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB003806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scaffold design plays a crucial role in developing graft-based regenerative strategies, especially when intended to be used in a highly ordered nerve tissue. Here we describe a hybrid matrix approach, which combines the structural properties of collagen (type I) with the epitope-presenting ability of peptide amphiphile (PA) nanofibers. Self-assembly of PA and collagen molecules results in a nanofibrous scaffold with homogeneous fiber diameter of 20-30 nm, where the number of laminin epitopes IKVAV and YIGSR can be varied by changing the PA concentrations over a broad range of 0.125-2 mg/ml. Granule cells (GC) and Purkinje cells (PC), two major neuronal subtypes of cerebellar cortex, demonstrate distinct response to this change of epitope concentration. On IKVAV hybrid constructs, GC density increases three-fold compared with the control collagen substrate at a PA concentration of >= 0.25 mg/ml, while PC density reaches a maximum (five-fold vs. control) at 0.25 mg/ml of PA and rapidly decreases at higher PA concentrations. In addition, adjustment of the epitope number allowed us to achieve fine control over PC dendrite and axon growth. Due to the ability to modulate neuron survival and maturation by easy manipulation of epitope density, our design offers a versatile test bed to study the extracellular matrix (ECM) contribution in neuron development and the design of optimal neuronal scaffold biomaterials. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据