4.8 Article

Dendrimer-based targeted intravitreal therapy for sustained attenuation of neuroinflammation in retinal degeneration

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 979-988

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.010

关键词

PAMAM dendrimers; Neuroinflammation; Retinal degeneration; Microglia; Age-related macular degeneration; Retinitis pigmentosa

资金

  1. Wilson Foundation
  2. Ligon Center
  3. Dryer Foundation
  4. WSU
  5. Foundation for preventing blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinal neuroinflammation, mediated by activated microglia, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of photoreceptor and retinal pigment epithelial cell loss in age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. Targeted drug therapy for attenuation of neuroinflammation in the retina was explored using hydroxyl-terminated polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer-drug conjugate nanodevices. We show that, upon intravitreal administration, PAMAM dendrimers selectively localize within activated outer retinal microglia in two rat models of retinal degeneration, but not in the retina of healthy controls. This pathology-dependent biodistribution was exploited for drug delivery, by covalently conjugating fluocinolone acetonide to the dendrimer. The conjugate released the drug in a sustained manner over 90 days. In vivo efficacy was assessed using the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rat retinal degeneration model over a four-week period when peak retinal degeneration occurs. One intravitreal injection of 1 mu g of FA conjugated to 7 mu g of the dendrimer was able to arrest retinal degeneration, preserve photoreceptor outer nuclear cell counts, and attenuate activated microglia, for an entire month. These studies suggest that PAMAM dendrimers (with no targeting ligands) have an intrinsic ability to selectively localize in activated microglia, and can deliver drugs inside these cells for a sustained period for the treatment of retinal neuroinflammation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据