4.8 Article

The osteogenesis of bacterial cellulose scaffold loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 28, 页码 6644-6649

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.071

关键词

Osteogenesis; Bacterial cellulose scaffold; Bone morphogenetic protein-2; Nanofibrous

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2009AA03Z311, 2012AA020501]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Program (973 Program) of China [2011CB710905]
  3. Jiangsu Province Orthopedic Clinical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a nanofibrous biological material with attractive physicochemical properties and biocompatibility. Its fiber is similar to the collagenous fiber of bone. To explore if BC could be utilized as a localized delivery system to increase the local concentration of cytokines for tissue engineering, we prepared the BC scaffold from Acetobacter xylinum X-2 (A. xylinum X-2) and investigated the osteogenic potential of the BC scaffold coated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). The data showed that BC had a good biocompatibility and induced differentiation of mouse fibroblast-like C2C12 cells into osteoblasts in the presence of BMP-2 in vitro, as demonstrated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assays. Within a certain range (0 similar to 3 mu g/scaffold), the osteogenic activity of induced osteoblasts was positively correlated to the concentrations of BMP-2. In in vivo subcutaneous implantation studies. BC scaffolds carrying BMP-2 showed more bone formation and higher calcium concentration than the BC scaffolds alone at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The ALP activity assay and the measurement of calcium concentration of BC scaffolds also showed that more new bone was developed in the BC scaffolds carrying BMP2 than in the BC scaffolds alone. Our studies suggest that BC is a good localized delivery system for BMPs and would be a potential candidate in bone tissue engineering. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据