4.8 Article

The engineering of organized human corneal tissue through the spatial guidance of corneal stromal stem cells

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 1343-1352

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.055

关键词

Stem cell; Collagen; Nano-structured; Topographic cues; Electrospinning

资金

  1. Center of Biologic Imaging (CBI) of University of Pittsburgh
  2. UPMC Eye Center
  3. McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Research to Prevent Blindness Inc.
  4. NIH [EY016145]
  5. NIH CORE [P30 EY008098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corneal stroma is an avascular connective tissue characterized by layers of highly organized parallel collagen fibrils, mono-disperse in diameter with uniform local interfibrillar spacing. Reproducing this level of structure on a nano- and micro-scale may be essential to engineer corneal tissue with strength and transparency similar to that of native cornea. A substrate of aligned poly(ester urethane) urea (PEUU) fibers, 165 +/- 55 nm in diameter, induced alignment of cultured human corneal stromal stem cells (hCSSCs) which elaborated a dense collagenous matrix, 8-10 mu m in thickness, deposited on the PEUU substratum. This matrix contained collagen fibrils with uniform diameter and regular interfibrillar spacing, exhibiting global parallel alignment similar to that of native stroma. The cells expressed high levels of gene products unique to keratocytes. hCSSCs cultured on PEUU fibers of random orientation or on a cast film of PEUU also differentiated to keratocytes and produced abundant matrix, but lacked matrix organization. These results demonstrate the importance of topographic cues in instructing organization of the transparent connective tissue of the corneal stroma by differentiated keratocytes. This important information will help with design of biomaterials for a bottom-up strategy to bioengineer spatially complex, collagen-based nano-structured constructs for corneal repair and regeneration. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据