4.8 Article

Self-attaching and cell-attracting in-situ forming dextran-tyramine conjugates hydrogels for arthroscopic cartilage repair

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 3164-3174

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.001

关键词

Adhesion mechanism; Cartilage tissue engineering; Collagen; Cross-linking; Hydrogel; Interface

资金

  1. DPTE (Dutch Program for Tissue Engineering)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small cartilage defects are frequently treated with debridement or left untreated, predisposing to early onset osteoarthritis. We propose to fill these defects with a cell-free injectable hydrogel comprising dextran-tyramine conjugates (Dex-TA) that can be applied during arthroscopic procedures. In this study, we report on the adhesion mechanism between cartilage and Dex-TA hydrogels and enhancement of cell ingrowth by incorporation of Heparin-tyramine (Hep-TA) conjugates. The enzyme-catalyzed crosslinking reaction of Dex-TA and Hep-TA hydrogels is based on covalent bonding of hydroxyphenyl residues. We hypothesized that this reaction results in covalent bonding of the hydroxyphenyl residues in Dex-TA and Hep-TA to tyrosine residues in cartilage matrix proteins. The involvement of TA residues was confirmed by modelling the enzymatic reaction occurring during gelation. The mechanical analysis indicated that higher tyramine content led to stronger binding. Interfacial cartilage-hydrogel morphology and Raman spectroscopy demonstrated collagens' reorganization and evidenced the coupling of TA to tyrosine residues in collagen. Moreover, the addition of Hep-TA induced cell recruitment. Collectively, in vitro and ex vivo functional studies evidenced the covalent bonding of TA-containing hydrogels to tyrosine residues in cartilaginous matrix proteins. Moreover, the cell-attracting ability of these hydrogels could be explored to guide tissue repair in focal cartilage defects, preventing or delaying the onset osteoarthritis. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据