4.8 Article

Simultaneous induction of autophagy and toll-like receptor signaling pathways by graphene oxide

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 27, 页码 6559-6569

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.064

关键词

Autophagy; Graphene oxide; Nanomaterials; Toll-like receptor; Signal transduction

资金

  1. National Tsing Hua University [99N2544E1, 100N2050E1, 101N2060E1]
  2. National Science Council, Taiwan [99-2221-E-007-025-MY3, 100-2628-E-007-029 MY2, 100-2325-B-080-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets have sparked growing interests in biological and medical applications. This study examined how macrophage, the primary immune cell type engaging microbes, responded to GO treatment. We uncovered that incubation of macrophage cell RAW264.7 with GO elicited autophagy in a concentration-dependent manner, as evidenced by the appearance of autophagic vacuoles and activation of autophagic marker proteins. Such GO-induced autophagy was observed in various cell lines and in macrophage treated with GO of different sizes. Strikingly, GO treatment of macrophage provoked the toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling cascades and triggered ensuing cytokine responses. Molecular analysis identified that TLR4 and TLR9 and their downstream signaling mediators MyD88. TRAF6 and NF-kappa B played pivotal roles in the GO-induced inflammatory responses. By silencing individual genes in the signaling pathway, we further unveiled that the GO-induced autophagy was modulated by TLR4, TLR9 and was dependent on downstream adaptor proteins MyD88. TRIF and TRAF6. Altogether, we demonstrated that GO treatment of cells simultaneously triggers autophagy and TLR4/TLR9-regulated inflammatory responses, and the autophagy was at least partly regulated by the TLRs pathway. This study thus suggests a mechanism by which cells respond to nanomaterials and underscores the importance of future safety evaluation of nanomaterials. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据