4.8 Article

Stem cell membrane engineering for cell rolling using peptide conjugation and tuning of cell-selectin interaction kinetics

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 20, 页码 5004-5012

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.065

关键词

Inflammation; Cell engineering; Cell surface; Myocardial infarction; Bioorthogonal chemistry

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [HHSN268201000045C]
  2. NIH [2-P30-CA14051]
  3. Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine [W81XWH-08-2-0034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic cell microenvironment interactions regulate many biological events and play a critical role in tissue regeneration. Cell homing to targeted tissues requires well balanced interactions between cells and adhesion molecules on blood vessel walls. However, many stem cells lack affinity with adhesion molecules. It is challenging and clinically important to engineer these stem cells to modulate their dynamic interactions with blood vessels. In this study, a new chemical strategy was developed to engineer cell microenvironment interactions. This method allowed the conjugation of peptides onto stem cell membranes without affecting cell viability, proliferation or multipotency. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) engineered in this manner showed controlled firm adhesion and rolling on E-selectin under physiological shear stresses. For the first time, these biomechanical responses were achieved by tuning the binding kinetics of the peptide-selectin interaction. Rolling of engineered MSCs on E-selectin is mediated by a Ca2+ independent interaction, a mechanism that differs from the Ca2+ dependent physiological process. This further illustrates the ability of this approach to manipulate cell microenvironment interactions, in particular for the application of delivering cells to targeted tissues. It also provides a new platform to engineer cells with multiple functionalities. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据