4.7 Article

Erectile dysfunction and coronary risk factors: Prospective results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 328-338

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0643

关键词

impotence; coronary disease; risk factors; smoking; men; aging

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-04673] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-44995] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Erectile dysfunction (ED), a widespread and troublesome condition among middle-aged men, is partly vascular in origin. In the Massachusetts Male Aging Study, a random-sample cohort study, we investigated the relationship between baseline risk factors for coronary heart disease and subsequent ED, on the premise that subclinical arterial insufficiency might be manifested as ED. Methods. Men ages 40-70, selected from state census lists, were interviewed in 1987-1989 and reinterviewed in 1995-1997. Data were collected and blood was drawn in participants' homes. ED was assessed from responses to a privately self-administered questionnaire. Analysis was restricted to 513 men with no ED at baseline and no diabetes, heart disease, or related medications at either time. Results. Cigarette smoking at baseline almost doubled the likelihood of moderate or complete ED at followup (24% vs 14%, adjusted for age and covariates, P = 0.01). Cigar smoking and passive exposure to cigarette smoke also significantly predicted incident ED, as did overweight (body-mass index greater than or equal to 28 kg/m(2)) and a composite coronary risk score. Weaker prospective associations were seen for hypertension and dietary intake of cholesterol and unsaturated fat. Conclusions. Erectile dysfunction and coronary heart disease share some behaviorally modifiable determinants in men who, like our sample, are free of manifest ED or predisposing illness. Open questions include whether modification of coronary risk factors can prevent ED and whether ED may serve as a sentinel event for coronary disease. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据