4.8 Article

Protein polymer hydrogels by in situ, rapid and reversible self-gelation

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 21, 页码 5451-5458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.083

关键词

Hydrogel; Thermally responsive material; Cross-linking; Drug delivery

资金

  1. NIH [R01-GM-061232, R01-EB-000188, R01-CA-138784, R01-EB-001037]
  2. NSF [CHE-0646670]
  3. Science and Technology Foundation of Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24790052] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein-based biomaterials are an important class of materials for applications in biotechnology and medicine. The exquisite control of their composition, stereochemistry, and chain length offers unique opportunities to engineer biofunctionality, biocompatibility, and biodegradability into these materials. Here, we report the synthesis of a thermally responsive peptide polymer-based hydrogel composed of a recombinant elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) that rapidly forms a reversibly cross-linked hydrogel by the formation of intermolecular disulfide cross-links. To do so, we designed and synthesized ELPs that incorporate periodic cysteine residues (cELPs), and show that cELPs are thermally responsive protein polymers that display rapid gelation under physiologically relevant, mild oxidative conditions. Gelation of cELPs, at concentrations as low as 2.5 wt%, occurs in similar to 2.5 min upon addition a low concentration of hydrogen peroxide (0.3 wt%). We show the utility of these hydrogels for the sustained release of a model protein in vitro, and demonstrate the ability of this injectable biomaterial to pervade tumors to maximize tumor coverage and retention time upon intratumoral injection. cELPs represent a new class of injectable reversibly cross-linked hydrogels with properties intermediate between ELP coacervates and chemically cross-linked ELP hydrogels that will find useful applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据