4.8 Review

A review of combined experimental and computational procedures for assessing biopolymer structure-process-property relationships

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 33, 页码 8240-8255

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.054

关键词

Biopolymers; Material design; Elastin; Collagen; Silk; Integration

资金

  1. NIH [U01 EB014976]
  2. NSF
  3. DOD (AFOSR)
  4. DOD (MURI)
  5. German National Academic Foundation (Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes)
  6. Dr. Jurgen-Ulderup-Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tailored biomaterials with tunable functional properties are desirable for many applications ranging from drug delivery to regenerative medicine. To improve the predictability of biopolymer materials functionality, multiple design parameters need to be considered, along with appropriate models. In this article we review the state of the art of synthesis and processing related to the design of biopolymers, with an emphasis on the integration of bottom-up computational modeling in the design process. We consider three prominent examples of well-studied biopolymer materials elastin, silk, and collagen and assess their hierarchical structure, intriguing functional properties and categorize existing approaches to study these materials. We find that an integrated design approach in which both experiments and computational modeling are used has rarely been applied for these materials due to difficulties in relating insights gained on different length- and time-scales. In this context, multiscale engineering offers a powerful means to accelerate the biomaterials design process for the development of tailored materials that suit the needs posed by the various applications. The combined use of experimental and computational tools has a very broad applicability not only in the field of biopolymers, but can be exploited to tailor the properties of other polymers and composite materials in general. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据