4.8 Article

Gold nanoparticles functionalized with therapeutic and targeted peptides for cancer treatment

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1180-1189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.058

关键词

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs); Therapeutic peptide PMI (p12); Targeted peptide (CRGDK); Neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptor; p53 mechanism; Cancer treatment

资金

  1. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [30970784, 81171455]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2009CB930200]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [07165111ZX]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functionalization of nanostructures such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with different biological molecules has many applications in biomedical imaging, clinical diagnosis and therapy. Researchers mostly employed AuNPs larger than 10 nm for different biological and medicinal applications in previous studies. Herein, we synthesized a novel small (2 nm) AuNPs, which were functionalized with the therapeutic peptide, PMI (p12), and a targeted peptide, CRGDK for selective binding to neuropilin-1(Nrp-1) receptors which overexpressed on the cancer cells and regulated the process of membrane receptor-mediated internalization. It was found that CRGDK peptides increased intracellular uptake of AuNPs compared to other surface conjugations quantified by ICP-MS. Interestingly, CRGDK functionalized AuNPs resulted in maximal binding interaction between the CRGDK peptide and targeted Nrp-1 receptor overexpressed on MDA-MB-321 cell surface, which improved the delivery of therapeutic P12 peptide inside targeted cells. Au@p12 + CRGDK nanoparticles indicated with highly effective cancer treatment by increasing p53 expression upregulated with intracellular enhanced p12 therapeutic peptide. These results have implications to design and functionalize different molecules onto AuNPs surfaces to make hybrid model system for selective target binding as well as therapeutic effects for cancer treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据