4.8 Article

Transfection of VEGF165 genes into endothelial progenitor cells and in vivo imaging using quantum dots in an ischemia hind limb model

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 33, 页码 8670-8684

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.012

关键词

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs); Endothelial cells; VEGF; QD; Angiogenesis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0017904, 2011-0019491]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0019491] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were transfected with fluorescently labeled quantum dot nanoparticles (QD NPs) with or without VEGF(165) plasmid DNA (pDNA) to probe the EPCs after in vivo transplantation and to test whether they presented as differentiated endothelial cells (ECs). Bare QD NPs and QD NPs coated with PEI or PEI + VEGF(165) genes were characterized by dynamic light scattering, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Transfection of EPCs with VEGF(165) led to the expression of specific genes and proteins for mature ECs. A hind limb ischemia model was generated in nude mice, and VEGF(165) gene-transfected EPCs were transplanted intramuscularly into the ischemic limbs. At 28 days after transplantation, the VEGF(165) gene-transfected EPCs significantly increased the number of differentiated ECs compared with the injection of medium or bare EPCs without VEGF(165) genes. Laser Doppler imaging revealed that blood perfusion levels were increased significantly by VEGF(165) gene-transfected EPCs compared to EPCs without VEGF(165). Moreover, the transplantation of VEGF(165) gene-transfected EPCs increased the specific gene and protein expression levels of mature EC markers and angiogenic factors in the animal model. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据