4.8 Article

Local suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the effects in BMP-2-induced bone regeneration

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 304-316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.050

关键词

Inflammation suppression; Pro-inflammatory cytokines; Bone regeneration; Triptolide; Bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2); Controlled release

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of local inflammation suppression on the bone regeneration. Gelatin hydrogels incorporating mixed immunosuppressive triptolide-micelles and bone morphogenic protein-2 (BMP-2) were prepared. The controlled release of both the triptolide and BMP-2 from the hydrogels was observed under in vitro and in vivo conditions. When either J774.1 macrophage-like or MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells were cultured in the hydrogels incorporating mixed 2.5, 5 or 10 mg of triptolide-micelles and BMP-2, the expression level of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 was down-regulated, but the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was promoted compared with those of hydrogels incorporating BMP-2 without triptolide-micelles. When implanted into a critical-sized bone defect of rats, the hydrogels incorporating mixed 2.5 or 5 mg of triptolide-micelles and BMP-2 showed significantly lower number of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages or dendritic and mast cells infiltrated into the defect, and lower expression level of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 than those incorporating BMP-2 without triptolide-micelles. The reduced local inflammation responses at the defects implanted with the hydrogels incorporating mixed 2.5 or 5 mg of triptolidemicelles and BMP-2 subsequently enhanced the bone regeneration thereat. It is concluded that the proper local modulation of inflammation responses is a promising way to achieve the enhanced bone regeneration. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据