4.7 Article

The role of development and duration of exposure to the embryotoxicity of diazinon

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 403-418

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00065-X

关键词

diazinon; embryotoxicity; developmental sensitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medaka, Oryzias latipes, were used as a laboratory surrogate for species of concern to define the effects of diazinon exposure on teleost embryogenesis. Medaka embryos were placed in a static, non-renewal system and exposures initiated on days 1, 3, or 5 of development. Following initiation of exposure, replicates (n = 5) remained in diazinon for a total of 4 days or from the day of initiation to day 9 of development. This exposure scenario was designed to elucidate sensitive periods in development for diazinon-induced toxicity but also shows the effect of added exposure duration on the degree of toxicity. Embryos were observed daily and endpoints recorded included: edema formation, total hatch, mean day of hatch, percentage of larvae with swim bladder inflation, and total length of larvae on day 14, when observations were terminated. Diazinon exposure resulted in decreases in hatch success, swim bladder inflation and the total length of larvae. In addition, dose-response increases in the incidence of edemas of the pericardial sac and vitelline veins were recorded. As expected, severity of embryotoxicity was positively correlated with duration of exposure. While no developmental period was the most sensitive for all toxic effects, for certain endpoints the severity of effects was dependent on exposure timing. Total hatch was greatly affected in embryos exposed from day 1 until day 5 whereas edema was more prevalent in embryos exposed later in development. Finally, among endpoints recorded, total length of larvae was the most sensitive indicator of exposure with all exposure groups showing significant (P < 0.05) decreases in length at 5 ppm. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据