4.8 Article

The biocompatibility and biofilm resistance of implant coatings based on hydrophilic polymer brushes conjugated with antimicrobial peptides

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 16, 页码 3899-3909

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.013

关键词

Antimicrobial coatings; Implant-associated infection; Biofilm resistance; Blood/tissue toxicity; Antimicrobial peptides; Polymer brushes

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Advanced Foods and Materials Network
  4. Canadian Blood Services (CBS)
  5. Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  6. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  7. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
  8. MSFHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial colonization on implant surfaces and subsequent infections are one of the most common reasons for the failure of many indwelling devices. Several approaches including antimicrobial and antibioticeluting coatings on implants have been attempted; however, none of these approaches succeed in vivo. Here we report a polymer brush based implant coating that is non-toxic, antimicrobial and biofilm resistant. These coating consists of covalently grafted hydrophilic polymer chains conjugated with an optimized series of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). These tethered AMPs maintained excellent broad spectrum antimicrobial activity in vitro and in vivo. We found that this specially structured robust coating was extremely effective in resisting biofilm formation, and that the biofilm resistance depended on the nature of conjugated peptides. The coating had no toxicity to osteoblast-like cells and showed insignificant platelet activation and adhesion, and complement activation in human blood. Since such coatings can be applied to most currently used implant surfaces, our approach has significant potential for the development of infection-resistant implants. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据