4.8 Article

Induction of immunotolerance via mPEG grafting to allogeneic leukocytes

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 35, 页码 9494-9503

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.061

关键词

Poly(ethylene glycol); Tolerance; Immunocamouflage; Lymphocyte; Regulatory T cells; Th17 lymphocytes

资金

  1. Canadian Blood Services, Canadian Blood Services-Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CBS-CIHR)
  2. Health Canada
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The induction of anergy or tolerance to prevent allorecognition is of clinical interest. To this end, the effects of methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) [mPEG] grafting to allogeneic lymphocytes on proliferation and phenotype (Th17 and Treg) was examined in vitro and in vivo. Control studies demonstrated that PEGylation did not affect cells viability or proliferation (mitogen) potential. Conditioned media (1 degrees MLR) collected at 72 h from resting PBMC demonstrated no immunomodulatory effects whereas the control MLR demonstrated significant (p < 0.001) pro-proliferative potential and significantly increased in IL-2. TNF-alpha, and INF-gamma. However, 1 degrees media from either resting mPEG-PBMC or the PEGylated MLR resulted in a significant inhibitory effect (p < 0.001) in the 2 degrees MLR and no increase in cytokines. PEGylation of donor murine splenocytes resulted in significant in vivo immunosuppressive effects in H2-disparate mice. While unmodified allogeneic splenocytes resulted in a significant in vivo decrease in Treg and increased Th17 lymphocytes, PEGylated allogeneic splenocytes yielded significantly increased Tregs and baseline levels of Th17 lymphocytes. This effect was persistent to at least 30 days post challenge and was not reversed by unmodified allogeneic cells. These studies demonstrate that PEGylation of allogeneic lymphocytes induced an immunoquiescent state both in vitro and in vivo. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据