4.8 Article

Characterization of membrane materials and membrane coatings for bioreactor units of bioartificial kidneys

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1465-1476

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.061

关键词

Biocompatibility; Bioreactor; Epithelial cell; Membrane; Polysulphone; Surface treatment

资金

  1. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science. Technology and Research, Singapore)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioreactor unit of bioartificial kidneys contains porous membranes seeded with renal cells. For clinical applications, it is mandatory that human primary renal proximal tubule cells (HPTCs) form differentiated epithelia on the membranes. Here, we show that HPTCs do not grow and survive on a variety of polymeric membrane materials. This applies also to membranes consisting of polysulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PSF/PVP), which have been used in the bioreactor unit of bioartificial kidneys after coating with an extracellular matrix (ECM). Our data reveal that coating with just an ECM does not sufficiently improve HPTC performance on non-HPTC-compatible membrane materials. On the other hand, we have characterized the effects of a variety of surface treatments and coatings, and found that double coating with 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine and an ECM markedly improves Hint performance and results in the formation of differentiated epithelia on PSF/PVP membranes. We have also synthesized alternative membrane materials, and characterized membranes consisting of polysulfone and Fullcure (TM). We found that these membranes sustain proper HPTC performance without the need for surface treatments or coatings. Together, our data reveal that the materials that have been previously applied in bioartificial kidneys are not suitable for applications with HPTCs. This study elucidates the types of membrane materials and coatings that are favorable for the bioreactor unit of bioartificial kidneys. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据