4.8 Article

The correlation between gene expression of proinflammatory markers and bone formation during osseointegration with titanium implants

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 374-386

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.011

关键词

Osseointegration; Titanium; Gene expression; Bone remodelling; Biomechanics; In vivo

资金

  1. Institute of Biomaterials and Cell Therapy (IBCT)
  2. VINNOVAVinnVaxt
  3. Biomedical Development in Western Sweden
  4. Swedish Research Council [K2009-52X-09495-22-3]
  5. VINN Excellence Center of Biomaterials and Cell Therapy
  6. Region Vastra Gotaland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in vivo interfacial gene expression model combined with biomechanical analysis was used in order to determine the relationship between the molecular events taking place during osseointegration and the biomechanical stability of the implant Anodically oxidized and machined threaded titanium implants were characterized topographically chemically and ultrastructurally The Implants were Inserted in rat tibiae and the Implant bone torsion stability was evaluated After measurements the implants were removed and analyzed with qPCR Results showed an increase in the breakpoint torque of 140% 170% and 190% after 6 14 and 28 days respectively at the oxidized implants as compared to the machined Gene expression analysis revealed higher expression of runt related transcription factor-2 (Runx2) (after 28 d) osteocalcin (OC) and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (after 6 14 and 28 d) and cathepsin K (CATK) (after 6 and 14 d) at the oxidized implants On the other hand machined implants were associated with higher expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) (after 6 and 28 d) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) (after 6 14 and 28 d) compared to the oxidized Implants In conclusion the favorable cellular and molecular events at the oxidized implants were in parallel with significantly stronger bone anchorage during osseointegration (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据