4.8 Article

The impact of dendrimer-grafted modifications to model silicon surfaces on protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 35, 页码 9168-9179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.063

关键词

Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer; Saliva conditioning film; Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM-D); Bacterial adhesion; Streptococcus gordonii DL1; Dental implant

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RU 920/2-2, MU 2787/1-2, RU 409/9-1, SCHW 431/12-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the oral cavity, omnipresent salivary protein films (pellicle) mediate bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on natural tissues as well as on artificial implant surfaces, which may cause serious infectious diseases like periimplantitis. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the adsorption/desorption behaviour of human saliva on model surfaces grafted with polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer molecules compared to self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) exhibiting the same terminal functions (-NH2, -COOH) by two complementary analytical methods. Furthermore, the role of saliva conditioning of PAMAM and analogous SAM modifications on the adhesion of Streptococcus gordonii DL1, an early oral colonizer, was investigated. In contrast to SAMs. PAMAM-grafted surfaces showed reduced streptococcal adherence in the absence of pre-adsorbed saliva similar to the level obtained for poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) coatings. Moreover, coatings of PAMAM-NH2 maintained their bacteria-repellent behaviour even after saliva-conditioning. As a general outcome, it was found that lower amounts of protein adsorbed on PAMAM coatings than on analogous SAMs. Since this study demonstrates that covalently bound PAMAM dendrimers can modulate the oral bacterial response, this approach has significant potential for the development of anti-adhesive biomaterial surfaces that are conditioned with proteinaceous films. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据