4.8 Article

Thermally-modulated on/off-adsorption materials for pharmaceutical protein purification

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 619-627

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.012

关键词

Adsorption; Albumin; Silica; Plasma proteins; Protein adsorption; Surface modification

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Scienc [20300169]
  2. Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology (MEXT) Japan [20700399]
  3. Ministry of Environment Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the development of temperature-responsive adsorption materials for pharmaceutical protein purification poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N N-dimethylaminopropylacrylamide-co-N-tert-butylacrylamide) (P(IPAAm-co-DMAPAAm-co-tBAAm) brush grafted silica beads were prepared through a surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) The prepared silica beads as a chromatographic stationary phase were evaluated by observing their thermo-responsive elution profiles of plasma proteins including human serum albumin (HSA) and gamma-globulin Chromatograms of two proteins indicated that negatively-charged HSA was adsorbed on the cationic copolymer brush modified silica beads at higher temperatures with low concentration of phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 7 0) as a mobile phase The HSA adsorption was attributed to (1) an enhanced electrostatic interaction with the cationic copolymer brush at low concentration of PB and (2) an increased hydrophobic interaction from the dehydrated copolymer at high temperature Step-temperature gradient enabled HSA and gamma-globulin to be separated by the modulation of HSA adsorption/desorption onto the copolymer brush grafted silica beads These results suggested that the prepared copolymer brush grafted silica beads adsorbed negatively-charged proteins both through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions by the modulation of column temperature and gave attractive adsorption materials for protein purification process (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据