4.6 Article

Treatment of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with antineuronal antibodies (Anti-Hu, Anti-Yo) with a combination of immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide, and methylprednisolone

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.68.4.479

关键词

paraneoplastic neurological syndromes; antineuronal Ab; immunosuppressive treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives-To evaluate the effect of a combination of immunoglobulins (IVIg), cyclophosphamide (CTX), and methylprednisolone (MP) on the clinical course of patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) and antineuronal antibodies (Abs). Methods-Seventeen patients with paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis/sensory neuropathy (PEM/SN) with anti-Hu Abs (n=10) or cerebellar degeneration (PCD) with anti-Yo Abs (n=7) received one to nine cycles (mean 3.5) of a combination of IVIg (0.5 g/kg/day from days 1 to 5), CTX (600 mg/m2 at day 1) and MP (1g/day from day 1 to 3). The Rankin scale (RS) was used to evaluate the response. A positive response was considered as either improvement or stabilisation in patients who were still ambulatory (RS less than or equal to 3) at the onset of treatment, whereas only improvement, and not stabilisation, was considered a therapeutic benefit in bedridden patients (RS greater than or equal to 4). Results-Tolerance was good and no patient experienced grade 3/4 toxicity (World Health Organisation). Sixteen patients were evaluable for response. Of the seven patients with RS greater than or equal to 4, none improved. Of the nine patients with RS greater than or equal to 3, none improved but three (two SN and one PCD) stabilised for 4, 35, and 16 months. Conclusions-This study suggests that vigorous immunosuppressive treatment is not useful in severely disabled PNS patients with antineuronal Abs. In a minority of patients (mainly with SN) who are not severely disabled at the onset of treatment, a transient stabilisation is possible and deserves further evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据