4.8 Article

Enhanced angiogenesis of gene-activated dermal equivalent for treatment of full thickness incisional wounds in a porcine model

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 28, 页码 7308-7320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.013

关键词

Collagen-chitosan scaffold; Gene-activated dermal equivalent; DNA complexes; Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); Angiogenesis; Incisional wounds

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20934003, 50873088]
  2. Major State Basic Research Program of China [2005CB623902]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y4080184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis of dermal equivalent is one of the key issues for treatment of full thickness skin defects. To develop a gene-activated bilayer dermal equivalent (BDE), N,N,N-trimethyl chitosan chloride (TMC), a cationic gene delivery vector, was used to form complexes with the plasmid DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor-165 (VEGF-165), which was then incorporated into a collagen-chitosan/silicone membrane scaffold. To evaluate the angiogenesis property in vivo, full thickness skin defects were made on the back of pigs, into which the TMC/pDNA-VEGF complexes loaded BDE and other three control BDEs, i.e. the blank BDE, and the BDEs loaded with pDNA-VEGF and TMC/pDNA-eGFP complexes, respectively, were transplanted. Biopsy specimens were harvested at day 7, 10 and 14 after surgery for histology, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blotting analyses. The results showed that the TMC/pDNA-VEGF group had the strongest VEGF expression in mRNA and protein levels, resulting in the highest densities of newly-formed and mature vessels. The ultra-thin skin graft was further transplanted onto the dermis regenerated by the TMC/pDNA-VEGF complexes loaded BDE at day 10 and well survived. At 112 days grafting, the healing skin had a similar structure and similar to 80% tensile strength of the normal skin. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据