4.8 Article

Bioactive polymer/extracellular matrix scaffolds fabricated with a flow perfusion bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 31, 期 34, 页码 8911-8920

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.110

关键词

Bioreactor; ECM (extracellular matrix); Electrospun scaffold; Bioactivity; Cartilage tissue engineering; Mesenchymal stem cell

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR57083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) microfiber scaffolds, coated with cartilaginous extracellular matrix (ECM), were fabricated by first culturing chondrocytes under dynamic conditions in a flow perfusion bioreactor and then decellularizing the cellular constructs. The decellularization procedure yielded acellular PCL/ECM composite scaffolds containing glycosaminoglycan and collagen. PCL/ECM composite scaffolds were evaluated for their ability to support the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro using serum-free medium with or without the addition of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1). PCL/ECM composite scaffolds supported chondrogenic differentiation induced by TGF-beta 1 exposure, as evidenced in the up-regulation of aggrecan (11.6 +/- 3.8 fold) and collagen type II (668.4 +/- 317.7 fold) gene expression. The presence of cartilaginous matrix alone reduced collagen type I gene expression to levels observed with TGF-beta 1 treatment. Cartilaginous matrix further enhanced the effects of growth factor treatment on MSC chondrogenesis as evidenced in the higher glycosaminoglycan synthetic activity for cells cultured on PCL/ECM composite scaffolds. Therefore, flow perfusion culture of chondrocytes on electrospun microfiber scaffolds is a promising method to fabricate polymer/extracellular matrix composite scaffolds that incorporate both natural and synthetic components to provide biological signals for cartilage tissue engineering applications. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据